For Knox, from 🤫 hussh
What we bring to the kickoff.
A gap analysis, not a deck. Then a scoped engagement, an ATO, and federal buyers, together.
The order
Gap analysis, engagement, ATO, government.
- First 30 days
Scope the gap together
- We bring a concrete gap analysis to the kickoff: where 🤫 One Platform's consent kernel and receipt ledger already meet NIST 800-53 High controls, and where the work remains.
- Months 1 to 3
A scoped authorization engagement
- Knox runs its authorization pipeline against 🤫 One Platform, the same 90-day model that authorized Celonis.
- Hemant Baidwan's team reviews the architecture against FedRAMP High control requirements, so we know exactly what is left.
- Months 3 to 9
Authorization, then the story
- A FedRAMP High ATO for 🤫 One Platform, so our compliance pages can say authorized.
- A public story for both of us: the model works on a consent-first, edge-owned architecture, not only conventional SaaS.
- Month 9 and on
Into government, together
- Reach federal agencies through Carahsoft, the channel Knox and government already use.
- Extend the same track toward the DoD Impact Levels, one assessment at a time.
The first step
Point the pipeline at the real thing.
We would love the same rigor Hemant Baidwan brought to DHS and the FedRAMP Board, pointed at our actual architecture, with a clear list of what it takes to reach authorized. We can start on our side the day the kickoff ends.
Ninety days can change everything